1. Ahn YH, Chen WM, Lee KY, Park KW, Lee SJ. Comparison of the load-sharing characteristics between pedicle-based dynamic and rigid rod devices. Biomed Mater 2008 3:044101PMID:
19029615.
2. Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Tim Yoon S, Minamide A, Su Kim K, Tomita K, et al. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003 28:1560-1566. PMID:
12865845.
3. Bono CM, Lee CK. Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004 29:455-463. PMID:
15094543.
4. Bridwell KH, Sedgewick TA, O'Brien MF, Lenke LG, Baldus C. The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 1993 6:461-472. PMID:
8130395.
5. Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Buchowski JM, Daubs MD, Kim Y, et al. Adjacent segment disease followinglumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007 32:2253-2257. PMID:
17873819.
6. Cho KS, Kang SG, Yoo DS, Huh PW, Kim DS, Lee SB, et al. Risk factors and surgical treatment for symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spine fusion. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2009 46:425-430. PMID:
20041051.
7. Chosa E, Goto K, Totoribe K, Tajima N. Analysis of the effect of lumbar spine fusion on the superior adjacent intervertebral disk in the presence of disk degeneration, using the three-dimensional finite element method. J Spinal Disord Tech 2004 17:134-139. PMID:
15260097.
8. Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, Brower R, Montgomery DM, Kurz LT. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997 22:2807-2812. PMID:
9431616.
9. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, Hsu WK, Dawson EG. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004 86-A:1497-1503. PMID:
15252099.
10. Gornet MF, Chan FW, Coleman JC, Murrell B, Nockels RP, Taylor BA, et al. Biomechanical assessment of a PEEK rod system for semi-rigid fixation of lumbar fusion constructs. J Biomech Eng 2011 133:081009PMID:
21950902.
11. Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, Mannion AF. Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005 30:324-331. PMID:
15682014.
12. Iguchi T, Kanemura A, Kasahara K, Sato K, Kurihara A, Yoshiya S, et al. Lumbar instability and clinical symptoms: which is the more critical factor for symptoms: sagittal translation or segment angulation? J Spinal Disord Tech 2004 17:284-290. PMID:
15280756.
13. Kanayama M, Cunningham BW, Sefter JC, Goldstein JA, Stewart G, Kaneda K, et al. Does spinal instrumentation influence the healing process of posterolateral spinal fusion? An in vivo animal model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999 24:1058-1065. PMID:
10361653.
14. Kim TY, Kang KT, Yoon DH, Shin HC, Kim KN, Yi S, et al. Effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments: differences between surgical techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012 37:1456-1462. PMID:
22333957.
15. Kotani Y, Cunningham BW, Cappuccino A, Kaneda K, McAfee PC. The role of spinal instrumentation in augmenting lumbar posterolateral fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996 21:278-287. PMID:
8742202.
16. Oh CH, Ji GY, Jeon JK, Lee J, Yoon SH, Hyun DK. Slip reduction rate between minimal invasive and conventional unilateral transforaminal interbody fusion in patients with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Korean J Spine 2013 10:232-236. PMID:
24891854.
17. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004 29:1938-1944. PMID:
15534420.
18. Pfeiffer M, Deike B, Clausen JD, Wilke A, Griss P. A new semirigid implant for instrumentation of scoliosis: preliminary report. Eur Spine J 2001 10:427-436. PMID:
11718198.
19. Polly DW Jr, Santos ER, Mehbod AA. Surgical treatment for the painful motion segment: matching technology with the indications: posterior lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005 30(16 Suppl):S44-S51. PMID:
16103833.
20. Qi L, Li M, Zhang S, Xue J, Si H. Comparative effectiveness of PEEK rods versus titanium alloy rods in lumbar fusion: a preliminary report. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013 155:1187-1193. PMID:
23708088.
21. Smit TH, Müller R, van Dijk M, Wuisman PI. Changes in bone architecture during spinal fusion: three years follow-up and the role of cage stiffness. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003 28:1802-1808. PMID:
12923466.
22. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Haselkorn J, Kent D, Ciol MA, et al. Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions. JAMA 1992 268:907-911. PMID:
1640622.
23. Turner JL, Paller DJ, Murrell CB. The mechanical effect of commercially pure titanium and polyetheretherketone rods on spinal implants at the operative and adjacent levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010 35:E1076-E1082. PMID:
20838271.
24. Zhou ZJ, Zhao FD, Fang XQ, Zhao X, Fan SW. Meta-analysis of instrumented posterior interbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion in the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 2011 15:295-310. PMID:
21619404.